|
SIERRA CLUB
9/11 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
NEW YORK COMMITTEE FOR OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY & HEALTH
& ORGANIZATIONS AND UNIONS OF THE GROUND
ZERO COMMUNITY
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE: FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly
Flynn, 9/11 Environmental Action, 917-647-7074
Suzanne
Mattei, Sierra Club, 212-791-3600, ext. 35
GROUND
ZERO COMMUNITY URGES ANSWER FROM EPA BEFORE ELECTION: CITES
ANNIVERSARY OF WHITE HOUSE COMMITMENT TO CONSIDER TESTING
AND CLEANUP OF 9/11 CONTAMINATION
Approaching
the one-year anniversary of the White House Council on Environmental
Quality’s agreement to have an expert panel provide
advice on unmet needs related to 9/11 pollution, a coalition
of community, tenant, environmental, small business, religious
and labor organizations sent a letter today to the federal
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Their letter pleads
for a clear answer now – before the upcoming federal
election – on what action the federal government will
take to clean up 9/11 contamination and meet the health needs
of the people exposed to the pollution. The letter sets out
seven basic principles for cleanup and for addressing long-term
health needs. (The
letter is attached.)
“The
White House forced us to wait two years before it would even
agree to have an expert panel. Then EPA stalled that expert
panel for another year, arguing for absurdly inadequate approaches.
As a result, all testing has been put off until some time
after Election Day. We can’t help but worry what will
be left of this process after the election,” said Robert
Gulack, a New Jersey resident who was exposed to Ground Zero
contamination through his job at the Woolworth Building on
Broadway and Park Place. “If the federal government
is acting in good faith, then EPA can and should give us an
answer today,” he added.
The
agency has seen these principles before. The request for EPA
to adopt these principles was presented formally at the October
5, 2004 meeting of the EPA World Trade Center Expert Technical
Review Panel. The White House Council on Environmental Quality
had declared its agreement to create that Panel on October
27, 2003, as part of negotiations with Senator Hillary Clinton
over approval of the nomination of EPA Administrator Michael
Leavitt. In her power point presentation at the October 5
meeting, the Panel’s community liaison, Catherine McVay
Hughes, a parent and asthma-educator who lives very close
to Ground Zero, urged that the federal agency should make
a solid commitment now.
“People
are not going to want to open up their homes for testing if
they don’t also have a firm commitment that if anything
is found, it will be cleaned up,” Ms. Hughes explained.
The
letter urges EPA to conduct comprehensive testing for indoor
contamination not only in southern Manhattan but also in neighborhoods
of Brooklyn that were covered by the dust cloud. It calls
on EPA to commit to clean up contaminated buildings as warranted;
assert authority over environmental safety during demolition
of 9/11-contaminated structures such as the Deutsche Bank
building; and support long-term medical monitoring, and care
as needed, for people exposed to the World Trade Center pollution.
While EPA has published a proposed design for indoor testing,
community representatives note that it falls short of the
mark for a credible program. They expressed strong disappointment
that EPA had promised to work in partnership with the community,
yet did not engage in a dialogue with them before publishing
the protocol.
“Community
people have invested many hours in these meetings. Sometimes
we feel that progress is being made, but then we see some
back-sliding,” said Suzanne Mattei, Executive for the
Sierra Club’s national field office in New York City.
“The bottom line is, we don’t know what we have.
Is the federal government really going to help these people
or not? We don’t know.”
“Early
in the panel process, the community stepped forward to expose
the inadequacies of EPA's testing and cleanup. We've proven
that input from the community is the best assurance we have
for preventing a repeat of past mistakes. The shortcomings
of the current plan reflect EPA's failure to partner with
the community," said Kimberly Flynn, spokesperson for
9/11 Environmental Action.
"The
EPA's proposed testing program has very little benefit for
people whose workplaces are in Lower Manhattan," said
Joel Shufro, Executive Director of the New York Committee
for Occupational Safety and Health, "because the EPA
wants to leave the decision about whether a workplace will
be tested up to the employer. If employees want testing done
in their workplace, the employer should not have veto power
over the employees' right to know whether their workplace
is safe."
Paul
Stein, Health and Safety Chairperson for the New York State
Public Employees Federation, Division, 199, stated, “Our
members, employees of the New York State Department of Health,
are angry that the federal government is doing such a poor
job of protecting the health of New Yorkers who live and work
near the World Trade Center site.”
Jenna
Orkin, a Brooklyn resident who has tesified to the EPA panel
about the need to conduct tests in Brooklyn, observes, “Following
9/11, my apartment in Brooklyn had a level of asbestos that
was cause for concern. Even after a professional abatement,
areas of the apartment still posed a significantly high cancer
risk from asbestos. Their neglect of Brooklyn is an outrage.”
“We
expect and we want the EPA to make it happen,” said
Stan Mark, attorney and Program Director for the Asian American
Legal Defense Fund, which has advocated for testing all downtown
neighborhoods, including Chinatown and the Lower East Side,
and other affected areas.
The
organizations signing the letter represent many thousands
of residents and workers in neighborhoods affected by the
dust cloud that penetrated buildings upon the collapse of
the towers. They include local resident associations, such
as the Independence Plaza North Tenants Association, as well
as borough-wide groups such as the Met Council on Housing
and statewide groups such as Tenants and Neighbors. Unions
of workers concerned about renewed contamination from the
pending demolition of the highly contaminated Deutsche Bank
building, such as the National Postal Mail Handlers Union,
Local 300, the Civil Service Employees Association and Public
Employees Federation also joined in the call for a clear answer
from the federal government. The
letter with full list of signatories follows.
NYCOSH's
9/11-related work is conducted in partnership with the United
Church of Christ's National Disaster Ministries, with additional
support from the September 11th Fund created by the United
Way of New York City and the New York Community Trust.
|